name: The Universalism of fundamental human rights and the agents of global justice
keyword_list: agents of justice cosmopolitanism globalization universal fundamental rights justice
abstract: Globalization scales up to the global level the perpetual problem of building a just society. This dissertation asks to what extent fundamental human rights ought to be fulfilled at different levels of governance and which agents affect the distribution of rights and duties and are entitled to implement fundamental rights at the global level?
  It deals with the question within Constructivism and Critical School in IR. It combines the insights from Rainer Forst’s constructivist theory of justice understood as the right to justification, and Aristotle’s theory of justice understood as a fair mean. It uses a semantic-Pragmatic Approach to concept analysis and case study. The semantic-Pragmatic approach is used to examine the scope of fundamental rights regarding the analysis of the contextual bias of the modern-era conception of fundamental rights and the description of the social and political contexts, shaped by the relation of cooperation as well as conflict, which make claims of (global) justice meaningfully applicable. Two cases selected to study the agents of global justice are the Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal and Constitutional Courts.
  The main results of the research can be summarized in the following points.
  
  •	The modern era understanding of universal rights is biased by the society of its origin (the European society). 
  •	The two current theories of global justice, namely statism and cosmopolitanism, endorse an imbalanced approach in estimating the extent to which fundamental human rights ought to be implemented and show a lack of understanding of the agents entitled to enforce fundamental rights at the global level.
  •	Universal fundamental human rights must be understood in relation to one another, and their overall fulfillment must be carried out to some extent according to a core fair mean. 
  •	The innovative balanced approach toward global justice can reconcile global justice’s political and moral sides and take together the entitlement of universal fundamental rights and duties to each human being with the ties and commitment rising from the relations human beings owe one another.
  •	Permanent Peoples’ Tribunal and Constitutional Courts represent two good examples to foster global justice keeping up with the enlarging scale of global justice.
chairman_dissertation_council.name: Татьяна
chairman_dissertation_council.surname: Алексеева
chairman_dissertation_council.patronymic: Александровна
chairman_dissertation_council.position: Заведующий кафедрой политической теории
chairman_dissertation_council.degree: Доктор политических наук
chairman_dissertation_council.rank: Профессор
chairman_dissertation_council.wos_research_id: ABF-2633-2021
chairman_dissertation_council.scopus_author_id: 57210770429
chairman_dissertation_council.territory: РОССИЯ
organization_supervisor.name: Максим
organization_supervisor.surname: Иноземцев
organization_supervisor.patronymic: Игоревич
organization_supervisor.position: Заместитель начальника управления научной политики-начальник Отдела диссертационных советов
organization_supervisor.territory: РОССИЯ
rubrics.code: 11.01.61
rubrics.name: Политические науки и философия
rubrics.code: 11.01.67
rubrics.name: Политические науки и право
oecds.code: 05.06.UU
oecds.name: POLITICAL SCIENCE
speciality_codes.name: Теория и философия политики, история и методология политической науки
speciality_codes.code: 23.00.01
supervisors.fio: Харкевич М.В.
supervisors.scientific_degree: Кандидат политических наук
supervisors.speciality_code: Политические проблемы международных отношений, глобального и регионального развития
supervisors.responsible_type: Научный руководитель
opponents.fio: Зонова Т.В.
opponents.scientific_degree: Доктор политических наук
opponents.speciality_code: Политические институты, процессы и технологии
opponents.responsible_type: Оппонент
opponents.fio: Мчедлова М.М.
opponents.scientific_degree: Доктор политических наук
opponents.speciality_code: Политические институты, процессы и технологии
opponents.responsible_type: Оппонент
protection_organization.short_name: МГИМО МИД РОССИИ
protection_organization.name: ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ АВТОНОМНОЕ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ ВЫСШЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ "МОСКОВСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ ИНСТИТУТ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ (УНИВЕРСИТЕТ) МИНИСТЕРСТВА ИНОСТРАННЫХ ДЕЛ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ"
protection_organization.ogrn: 1037739194217
protection_organization.supervisor_name: АНАТОЛИЙ
protection_organization.supervisor_surname: ТОРКУНОВ
protection_organization.supervisor_patronymic: ВАСИЛЬЕВИЧ
protection_organization.organization_type: Организация
protection_organization.okogu: Министерство иностранных дел Российской Федерации
protection_organization.okopf: Федеральные государственные автономные учреждения
author_organization.short_name: МГИМО МИД РОССИИ
author_organization.name: ФЕДЕРАЛЬНОЕ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННОЕ АВТОНОМНОЕ ОБРАЗОВАТЕЛЬНОЕ УЧРЕЖДЕНИЕ ВЫСШЕГО ОБРАЗОВАНИЯ "МОСКОВСКИЙ ГОСУДАРСТВЕННЫЙ ИНСТИТУТ МЕЖДУНАРОДНЫХ ОТНОШЕНИЙ (УНИВЕРСИТЕТ) МИНИСТЕРСТВА ИНОСТРАННЫХ ДЕЛ РОССИЙСКОЙ ФЕДЕРАЦИИ"
author_organization.ogrn: 1037739194217
author_organization.supervisor_name: АНАТОЛИЙ
author_organization.supervisor_surname: ТОРКУНОВ
author_organization.supervisor_patronymic: ВАСИЛЬЕВИЧ
author_organization.organization_type: Организация
author_organization.okogu: Министерство иностранных дел Российской Федерации
author_organization.okopf: Федеральные государственные автономные учреждения